Office & Productivity

Whole subtree0 votes

No votes yet. Be the first voter.

Rating criteria

Your tier is simply your own subjective judgment — that's fine. The following are rough guidelines when voting.

  • S

    RecommendedExecutes tasks effortlessly. Produces the intended output with few prompts and turns. Excellent cost performance. Almost no hallucinations.

  • A

    GoodExperienced users can accomplish most tasks. Eventually produces the intended output. Good cost performance. Few hallucinations.

  • B

    AverageProduces the intended output only after many prompts and turns. Average cost performance. Errors and hallucinations occur.

  • C

    Somewhat flawedFairly likely to never produce the intended output no matter how many turns you take. Frequent errors and hallucinations.

  • Nearly impossibleFails to produce the intended output in most cases.

External benchmark composite (reference)

Papers, review sites, and hands-on media tests converted to tiers and averaged (as of 2026-07-14)

Simple average of per-source tiers (S=4 … C=1). Treat single-source tiers with caution (source count in parentheses).

Averaged from the subcategory benchmark tables (Translation, Proofreading & Rewriting, Slides, Meeting Notes, Transcription, Spreadsheets & Data, Workflow Automation).

Sources:WMT24 (人手評価)WMT25 General MTG2ITreview実測比較 (2026)G2ITreviewDemandSage 実測国内比較 (2025)PresentBenchUniPPTBenchG2ITreviewshareuhackMindStudioG2CapterraITreviewZapier 比較 (2026)JMIR ASR精度研究Open ASR LeaderboardAA Speech to Text国内精度ランキングG2SpreadsheetBench 2DABstepG2F9 Finance 実測G2CapterraITreviewDigitalApplied 比較 (2026)

Child threads

Ask in this categoryNo account needed