General Chat & Assistants

Whole subtree ・ 3 votes

This is the combined evaluation of votes for General Chat, General Agents, and General Assistant.

Compare general-purpose conversational AIs like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — tools that handle writing, summarizing, casual conversation, and quick research. Votes weigh response quality, specialties, and pricing to help you pick the one AI to start with.

Sub-categoriesVoting happens on each sub-category page

General Chat2 votesCompare how these AIs feel as a pure conversation partner — casual chat, brainstorming, and talking through ideas. Votes weigh how natural, engaging, and on-point each one is as a chat companion.General AgentsCompare autonomous, set-it-and-forget-it agents that research, book, and manipulate files on their own once given a task. See how usable computer-use and autonomous execution actually are, based on real users' votes.General Assistant3 votesCompare how well these AIs handle everyday practical tasks — quick tallies and calculations, simple file operations, and format conversions. This is lighter-weight than a fully autonomous agent: votes reflect how reliable each one is as a hands-on helper.

SRecommended

AGood

BAverage

CSomewhat flawed

✗Nearly impossible

Rating criteria

※ Your tier is simply your own subjective judgment — that's fine. The following are rough guidelines when voting.

SRecommended
Executes tasks effortlessly.Produces the intended output with few prompts and turns.Excellent cost performance.Almost no hallucinations.
AGood
Experienced users can accomplish most tasks.Eventually produces the intended output.Good cost performance.Few hallucinations.
BAverage
Produces the intended output only after many prompts and turns.Average cost performance.Errors and hallucinations occur.
CSomewhat flawed
Fairly likely to never produce the intended output no matter how many turns you take.Frequent errors and hallucinations.
✗Nearly impossible
Fails to produce the intended output in most cases.

Vote from a sub-category

This tier list aggregates votes cast in the sub-categories. Pick the one you want to vote in.

General Chat General Agents General Assistant

Compare with the Arena benchmark

arena.ai (formerly LMArena) blind-battle Elo, converted into tiers for reference ・ arena.ai ・ Data: LMArena Leaderboard Dataset (CC BY 4.0)

How to read this tier list (what is Arena?)

Arena (formerly LMArena) is a voting site where people compare two anonymous AI answers side by side and pick the better one. Votes from around the world are aggregated into an Elo rating, the same system used in chess.

Tiers come from the Elo gap to the board leader: within 20 = S, within 35 = A, within 60 = B, below that = C.

In the per-service view, each service is represented by its highest-scoring model.